Trying to start wars for no reason, picking fights with little countries he knows he can bully around. **** him! **** Bush! That's all.

damn you with that low little post count talkin all that ****.

shame

YEAH!

NO!!!!

watch now he is gonna make up the 400 post deficate to me within the time i go to class and work. thats 400 posts in like 5 hours.

how sad.

No reason, thats bull****.
Know the facts then talk ****.

That's ok Ben, I have a job. What's your excuse for your low ass post count?

mine? its higher than yours. oh and i equate mine to school, work, and training.

thats 3 things to your 1!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAH I WIN!!!!

wuv woo

I have criticized a lot george bush but when I think my perspective is from a third world country and not from the most powerful country just economic and military talking about, I get the conclusion that peace would not grant any economic gains and if war helps to maintain an status unfortunately is the only possible alternative. but it would be a disastrous political mistake to attack iraq without the UN consent. On the other side a lot terrorist groups will start to focus in the US as a target instead of Israel, Its no secret for anyone that the whole world in an economic recesion(crisis). If controlling the strategic oil reserves from the world grants the domain of it no doubt this war will start at any moment but there could be another solution wich I just think of it as impossible saddam leaving the power in iraq.

if u guys do some reading on saddam he one sick mother ****er.
and for all those ppl who dont want the us to go to war with iraq because they make like they care care about the iraqi people, just know that if u were in Iraq and siad one bad thing about saddam or his government u would be either killed or tortured.
We have to fight this war.

I dont agree with you chrisopher the usa isnt going to free the iraquis is going for other interests, if the USA cared for human rights in Saudi-Arabia the human rights are more violated even than in iraq. Iraq is a Tyranny no doubt but Saudi-Arabia has a medieval regime and Im not joking is true. Im opposed to war but my posture is just idealism unfortunately the world works in another form.

They are going for other intrests but they will free the iraqi ppl in the process and the world will be a safer place with saddam dead or out of power

I f George W. Bush is not careful, he may do the impossible and lose World War II . . . and the Cold War to boot. The single most important geopolitical accomplishment of American foreign policy over the past two generations was to prevent the unification of Europe -- and the greater Eurasian continent -- under a regime hostile to the United States.
We entered World War II, above all other reasons, to prevent a triumphant Nazi Germany from consolidating its conquest of Europe by starving Britain and neutralizing the Soviet Union.

We engaged in a 40-year Cold War to keep Western Europe looking westward rather than eastward, and we encouraged the split between Communist China and the Soviet Union for similar reasons in Asia.

Now -- in 2003 -- France, Germany, Russia and China are cooperating to oppose U.S. policy in Iraq, with implications for the future isolation of the United States around the world.

Recall how annoyed the United States became in the 1970s when West German leader Willy Brandt dared to talk with the Russians about easing East-West relations; we considered it a betrayal of the Western alliance. Now an enlarged Germany and Russia are not only talking but also cooperating to oppose aspects of American policy. Meanwhile, U.S. officials dismiss France and Germany as "Old Europe," taking comfort in the support of Latvia and Macedonia.

Recall how pleased Americans were when the Soviet Union and China were aiming more weapons at each other than at the United States. It took only a few months of Bush administration unilateralism to bring the Chinese and Russians together to proclaim their mutual interests.

Common cause on a single issue, of course, is not yet a massive anti-U.S. alliance. We're a long way from a new Warsaw Pact. Perhaps the Bush advisers are correct that Europe is too old (literally, with an aging population) and too militarily inept to count on the world scene. Perhaps they're correct that the power of the American economy, once it gets up and running again, is enough to overwhelm political opposition.

It's startling, nevertheless, to see NATO treated as a troublesome relic and to see the goals and accomplishments of 60 years ignored so blithely by a set of leaders who seem to have closed their history textbooks before they came to the chapters on FDR and Truman, let alone Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan.

Carl Abbott, professor of urban studies at Portland State University, is co-editor of the Pacific Historical Review.

http://oregonlive.com/commentary/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/editorial/1047473752108281.xml

Bush robbed a country of a democracy, and now he dares to impose his own version of a 'democracy' upon a country that didn't ask for it, against the will of the people.

Mmmm....

- The Jake

okay...so ya'll that don't like George Dubya are sayin' that you want us to leave these "little" countries alone..right? not mess with them, right? what if I told you that all of those mother ****ers had a minimum of 50 missiles that are so hard to avoid it could wipe out an entire fleet that's out there? so...you have these dudes...that don't like us...buying **** kickin' missiles from countries that don't like us (btw...why do you think France won't support us?)...and they're not gonna do anything with them? so, basically...you're sayin' since you take it in the ass you want the rest of us to...good plan...why don't you run the ****in' country *****.

Originally posted by The Jake
Bush robbed a country of a democracy, and now he dares to impose his own version of a 'democracy' upon a country that didn't ask for it, against the will of the people.

Mmmm....

- The Jake

You don't deserve to wear that Punisher t-shirt of yours, hippie.

Is that Laura, as in Laura Bush? This country would be a lot better off with me running it than George W. Bush.

1) What makes you say that?
2) It was a Venom tshirt. The Punisher one is in the wardrobe.
3) The Punisher was a true American patriot who got sick of the legal system. A system which let the killers of his family go free and, which granted Bush his presidency he had no right to have.....

- The Jake

This bull**** wouldn't be happening if Al Gore, the true winner of the 2000 election, were President today; he wouldn't start pointless wars. Bush is a ****ing monkey.

The Factor has been investigating just who is profiting by having Saddam Hussein in power. And here's what we found out for you.

Russia profits the most. Saddam owes Moscow billions for arms and supplies and is paying the debt off by sending the Putin government oil well below market prices. The Russians then turn around selling the oil, making huge profits.

Saddam has also given Russia contracts to explore for oil on Iraqi soil. Those could be worth hundreds of billions of dollars more.

So no way Russia wants Saddam out.

France sells Iraq just about everything and gets hard currency from Saddam in return. This is done under the U.N.'s oil-for-food program, which is a complete farce.

Iraq buys whatever it wants with oil money. The U.N. looks the other way. Some experts believe U.N. supervisors have been bribed by Saddam but The Factor has been unable to confirm that.

France also has signed oil exploration contracts with Saddam, although they are not nearly as lucrative as Russia's.

British and U.S. oil companies are still buying Iraqi oil through middle men in Jordan and Syria. America buys tons of oil that originates in Iraq, money that goes right to Saddam's military.

So this is embarrassing and the Bush Administration owes us an explanation, as does Prime Minister Blair.

The good news is that Mr. Bush has no vested interest in removing Saddam, other than the danger angle. American oil companies are getting Iraqi oil from Arab middle men fairly cheap, and this system benefits the U.S. economy.

So it's logical to assume that if Saddam did not pose a changer to us, the president would have no reason to push him out.

Finally, the Germans have sold billions in arms to Iraq and U.S. intelligence believes that country will be embarrassed when those deadly weapons are uncovered. Thus Germany does not want USA making that discovery.

So the next time somebody tells you that America should make a decision about military action against Saddam with the world's approval, you can read them this Talking Points Memo.

Our allies are making billions off Saddam. Those billions mean a lot more to them than American lives do. And that is the cold heart truth of the international situation.

And that is The Memo.

I hope this "clears **** up" for you guys.

TTT for the hippies. They need to defend their cause against the greatness that is O'Reilly.

You ****in liberal hippies make me sick.....

**** you Republicans!

http://www.madrone.com/Pictures/hippies.jpg

Originally posted by The Jake
Bush robbed a country of a democracy, and now he dares to impose his own version of a 'democracy' upon a country that didn't ask for it, against the will of the people.

Mmmm....

- The Jake

What country did he rob of democracy?
and what country is he imposing his own version of democracy against the will of the people