Listen right, i met an Australian once and he was an arsehole.

I met you mum once and she overcharged.

Listen right, i met an Australian once and he was an arsehole.

If he was an arsewhole i bet you ****ed him hard.

If he was an arsewhole i bet you ****ed him hard.

So what!!!!? Just leave me alone!! GODDDDDDD! YOUR AS BAD AS MY PARENTS!

:crying: :crying: :crying:

you're mum is bad ;)

mwah love you mickey

you're mum is bad ;)

mwah love you mickey

:kiss: i love you too. and yes my mum is bad! :(!

Listen right, i met an Australian once and he was an arsehole.

If it was Mel Gibson, then your statement seems factual. But were not all of that variety.

mel gibson isnt australian.

mel gibson isnt australian.

Mel Gibson IS Australian.

Did you think he was Scottish???

WOOOW

Though born in the US, Mel and his family moved to New South Wales, Australia. After high school, Mel studied at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, performing at the National Institute of Dramatic Arts alongside future film thespians Judy Davis and Geoffrey Rush.

I never knew that.

Thats strange, you never hear to many storys of people migrating to and from the US and Oz.

For the record. Mel Gibson is a first class tool who changes English history so much, it hurts.

Thats strange, you never hear to many storys of people migrating to and from the US and Oz.

For the record. Mel Gibson is a first class tool who changes English history so much, it hurts.

Whats he changed?

Whats he changed?

You seen Braveheart... well he pretty much ****ed that whole thing up.

- One example (of many) you know that William Wallace is meant to be ****ing the Princes wife, (The King of Englands daughter-in-law) and eventually gets her pregnant. Well that didn't ****ing happen and Mel made it up - pure Hollywood.

Now your gonna say ... but wait.. it might have happened! - but it couldn't have...because in real life, she wasn't ****ing born when William Wallace was still alive.

I find it really insulting to find that Mel Gibson has decided to question the legitimacy of a past Queen of England by suggesting that she shagged Braveheart. - Yet it was so obviously untrue. He just made it up on the spot and people believe it. He changed history for a better story... what a dick.

**** it.. you know at the end, i cheer, cos i supported the English all the way through the film anyway.

You seen Braveheart... well he pretty much ****ed that whole thing up.

- One example (of many) you know that William Wallace is meant to be ****ing the Princes wife, (The King of Englands daughter-in-law) and eventually gets her pregnant. Well that didn't ****ing happen and Mel made it up - pure Hollywood.

Now your gonna say ... but wait.. it might have happened! - but it couldn't have...because in real life, she wasn't ****ing born when William Wallace was still alive.

I find it really insulting to find that Mel Gibson has decided to question the legitimacy of a past Queen of England by suggesting that she shagged Braveheart. - Yet it was so obviously untrue. He just made it up on the spot and people believe it. He changed history for a better story... what a dick.

**** it.. you know at the end, i cheer, cos i supported the English all the way through the film anyway.

Thats the reason it's BASED on true events and not followed down to every last detail.

The english back then were obviously a bunch of ruthless cunts anyway. Fair enough you can try and take over for more land but king Edward was an evil mother ****er.

Thats the reason it's BASED on true events and not followed down to every last detail.

The english back then were obviously a bunch of ruthless cunts anyway. Fair enough you can try and take over for more land but king Edward was an evil mother ****er.

how do you know thats true...? Because Mel Gibson told you he was like that. Because Mel Gibson decided that the English had to be much badder than the rest of the humans on the Earth at that time? Remember... who were more civilised at the time? The English... or the Scots in there mud huts.

Don't believe what Gibson rams down your throat.

Its not the first film either where Mel Gibson has decided that English people should be portrayed as evil, sadistic and ruthless.


As for the based upon historical events... i would understand a little bending on the truth... but saying that William Wallace impregnated the future Queen of England and the heir to the throne is actually Wallace's child and not the King is going far far far of the mark. Especially when that Princess isn't even born.

Open your eyes tuggers!

how do you know thats true...? Because Mel Gibson told you he was like that. Because Mel Gibson decided that the English had to be much badder than the rest of the humans on the Earth at that time? Remember... who were more civilised at the time? The English... or the Scots in there mud huts.

Don't believe what Gibson rams down your throat.

Its not the first film either where Mel Gibson has decided that English people should be portrayed as evil, sadistic and ruthless.


As for the based upon historical events... i would understand a little bending on the truth... but saying that William Wallace impregnated the future Queen of England and the heir to the throne is actually Wallace's child and not the King is going far far far of the mark. Especially when that Princess isn't even born.

Open your eyes tuggers!


Haha, calm down.

you really dont like Mel Gibson do you?? And no it's not just because of what Mel Gibson has "rammed down my throat".

I think the way William Wallace was killed shows they wern't the nicest people. It's not really a subject i care much about to be honest anyway. I thought it was a good film. No matter how much Mel Gibson changed it.

Mel should have made a movie about how inbred the royal family is .

Mel should have made a movie about how inbred the royal family is .

It'd be a bit boring.

Mel should have made a movie about how inbred the royal family is .

I might be able to forgive Mel Gibson if he made an anti-royal film.


I'm a republican.

ahh Mel Gibson, one of my favourite people in the whole wide world. Did anyone watch the film "the patriot"? That film was such a great film and completly historically accurate, along with Braveheart.

Of course I am lying, Gibson is a English hating Cunt who should be forced to wear an english thong through the streets of any major city.

ahh Mel Gibson, one of my favourite people in the whole wide world. Did anyone watch the film "the patriot"? That film was such a great film and completly historically accurate, along with Braveheart.

Of course I am lying, Gibson is a English hating Cunt who should be forced to wear an english thong through the streets of any major city.

I'd like to see Mel make a film about English Jews. That would obviously not be a hateful film.

I'd like to see Mel make a film about English Jews. That would obviously not be a hateful film.

Yeah there will be plenty of love in that film. So much love that it will cause a revolt against the English jews by some innocent downtrodden people which will end in the destruction of these vicious English jews...or along those lines anyway.

I'd like to see Mel make a film about English Jews. That would obviously not be a hateful film.

Theres jews in England?!?!

You seen Braveheart... well he pretty much ****ed that whole thing up.

- One example (of many) you know that William Wallace is meant to be ****ing the Princes wife, (The King of Englands daughter-in-law) and eventually gets her pregnant. Well that didn't ****ing happen and Mel made it up - pure Hollywood.

Now your gonna say ... but wait.. it might have happened! - but it couldn't have...because in real life, she wasn't ****ing born when William Wallace was still alive.

I find it really insulting to find that Mel Gibson has decided to question the legitimacy of a past Queen of England by suggesting that she shagged Braveheart. - Yet it was so obviously untrue. He just made it up on the spot and people believe it. He changed history for a better story... what a dick.

**** it.. you know at the end, i cheer, cos i supported the English all the way through the film anyway.

Braveheart always leaves me with the urge that I need to kick **** out of the nearest Englishman

Braveheart always leaves me with the urge that I need to kick **** out of the nearest Englishman

listening to the streets has the same effect on me

i wasnt born in australia either, so no matter how much i love the country it still doesnt make me a true australian, even if i was young when we settled. Same goes here.

i wasnt born in australia either, so no matter how much i love the country it still doesnt make me a true australian, even if i was young when we settled. Same goes here.

At least you can act superior to the convicts.

At least you can act superior to the convicts.

'act' being the key word

Braveheart always leaves me with the urge that I need to kick **** out of the nearest Englishman

Your not the only one...and thats the problem. :chairshot

Damn Gibson! He'll get us all ****ing killed!

I cheer at the end when they hang, draw and quarter the bastard. Come on England!!!!

IIIINGGERLANND!

Your not the only one...and thats the problem. :chairshot

Damn Gibson! He'll get us all ****ing killed!

I cheer at the end when they hang, draw and quarter the bastard. Come on England!!!!

IIIINGGERLANND!

That was such a beautiful scene. I wish they actually did the same thing to Gibson, the least he deserves.

'act' being the key word


Nah, us poms are also naturally superior to you convicts.

Another thing i hate in Braveheart is the battle scenes..... throughout the film, not one ****ing Scotsman gets carved up in battle.

You'd think Wallace's army were invincible, either that or English are particularly shite at scrapping.

I hate you Gibson!!!!! :chairshot

Another thing i hate in Braveheart is the battle scenes..... throughout the film, not one ****ing Scotsman gets carved up in battle.

You'd think Wallace's army were invincible, either that or English are particularly shite at scrapping.

I hate you Gibson!!!!! :chairshot

i never got the so called amotion in breavheat because i wanted the english to win lol

Your not the only one...and thats the problem. :chairshot

Damn Gibson! He'll get us all ****ing killed!

I cheer at the end when they hang, draw and quarter the bastard. Come on England!!!!

IIIINGGERLANND!

bunch of pansies south of the border i tell you

bunch of pansies south of the border i tell you

Go have a deep fried mars bar sucka! lol

at least we have chippy sauce ya fairy.

chippy sauce?! whats that....

i bet ya don't even have mushy peas.

chippy sauce is a mixture of brown sauce and vinegar, I think its only Edinburgh that does it. Mushy peas no thanks

chippy sauce is a mixture of brown sauce and vinegar, I think its only Edinburgh that does it. Mushy peas no thanks


Sounds ****ing horrible! you can keep it!! haha

nah its nice mate, I'll struggle when i'm down in England like no chippy sauce, what the hell do you have with your chips then?

Thats the reason it's BASED on true events and not followed down to every last detail.

The english back then were obviously a bunch of ruthless cunts anyway. Fair enough you can try and take over for more land but king Edward was an evil mother ****er.
Braveheart is hardly based on actual events at all, most of what happens in the movie is pure fiction! The reason you believe the English were ruthless back then is because of movies like Braveheart. Edward was nothing like the character portrayed in the movie. In reality, other nationalities committed far worse acts than the English...

Here's an actual historical event that really did happen, the movie didn't show:

William Wallace, while invading, then pillaging and raping Northern England in 1297, came upon a church where some 70 English schoolboys were hiding. He ordered it burned, with the boys still inside. These children died a horrible death...

Historical facts:

- England never occupied Scotland when Wallace was a boy - they never killed his father. There never was a cruel occupation where they took the Scottish women for themselves in the 1290's.
- Wallace never captured York or any other castle in Northern England, although he did briefly invade.
- The battle of Stirling Bridge was the only one Wallace ever won. It was very different than the battle in the field shown in the movie - in reality, a small English force was overcome when they were divided by being halfway across a bridge.
- In the Battle of Falkirk, there were no Irishmen involved, although they were involved in other battles, willingly on the English side! The Irish generally liked Edward I, because they took their religion very seriously at that time, and Edward was a devout Roman Catholic, like most Irishmen. The Irish vs. English animosity began centuries later, when Protestant settlers arrived in Ireland. Edward was a good king who never ordered his men to fire arrows on their countrymen, as was shown in the movie.
- Edward I was one of history's greatest warriors. He didn't have a cough, and was a devout Catholic who led a crusade, not a pagan! The English never lost a battle when he led. He never pushed his son's friend out of a window (his son was a young boy in 1297, not a young man). Edward I was an amazing man: at the age of 67 in 1303, he led an assault on Stirling Castle, the last Scottish stronghold. His horse was killed by an arrow in that battle, the old king fell to the ground but wasn't hurt.

William Wallace was ruthless - Edward I was a great king and a good man, and was a hundred times better warrior than the Scotsman.

And I hope Amir Khan KOs William Limond today!

nah its nice mate, I'll struggle when i'm down in England like no chippy sauce, what the hell do you have with your chips then?

In Yorkshire?? We have mushy peas...then the other stuff, you know.. gravy, beans, curry sauce etc. Tomato/ Brown sauce. **** it... why dont you just get some brown sauce n mix the vinegar yourself??! How come your moving south of the border? - You wanted to have the wonders of England in your life that you miss out on in Scotland.... like flushing inside toilets and electricity haha. j/k.

(God... i can see you saying "English wanker" right now. haha.)

Nice one Joe. Top lad, have a book for your geeky research methods!!

This whole subject upsets me so much. Gibson has made such a disgrace to British heritage and history. Its quite insulting the way he recreated our history and ****ed it up so bad. Its a mockery and a lie and he should be ashambed.

He really has to think about what he's doing. You know, films like that could really have caused some damage if us and the Scots weren't two sensible nations. I mean... what if Mel Gibson had decided to do a film based upon the history of the I.R.A and the warring history of North and Southern Ireland. It could have stirred so much resentment and trouble. People could get hurt. What a ****ing idiot. A complete disregard for the truth and common sense.

yep the Mel gibson movie about the English tyranny in Scotland is fiction.I hope Mel does one about he 1788 invasion ,it wouldnt be nearly as boring as the royal family one .

yep the Mel gibson movie about the English tyranny in Scotland is fiction.I hope Mel does one about he 1788 invasion ,it wouldnt be nearly as boring as the royal family one .

erm no its a true story

yep the Mel gibson movie about the English tyranny in Scotland is fiction.I hope Mel does one about he 1788 invasion ,it wouldnt be nearly as boring as the royal family one .

British 1 Abos 0.

British 1 Abos 0.


they brought knives (spears) to a gun fight. never had a chance.

they brought knives (spears) to a gun fight. never had a chance.

They were complete primitives, not like other Pacific tribal groups who were pretty decent fighters.

Shame the Abo culture got so damaged though, their way of life looked rather strange.

i never met an Australian once

i never met an Australian once

a crying shame.