View Full Version : Jake Lamotta vs Marvin Hagler


The Troll
06-01-2007, 10:57 PM
What do you think on this. LaMotta fought Robinson 6 times who was obviously a strong fast combination puncher, Hagler probably has more one punch power and a very different style to Robinson. I think Hagler would take a descision but the late round might be brutal because they'd wear each other down bad come 12th 13th rounds.

porlie
06-01-2007, 11:06 PM
Yeah I agree it'd be a brutal fight towards the end but I think Hagler would win.

TysonHagler
06-01-2007, 11:16 PM
hagler KO.

easy as that.

porlie
06-01-2007, 11:25 PM
Remember Antufermo?? Hagler couldnt KO him easy as that.

Southpaw Stinger
06-01-2007, 11:31 PM
hagler KO.

easy as that.


I trust you mean TKO because no one is KO'ing Lamotta.

Anways, Hagler UD in a war.

ceboxer15
06-02-2007, 12:30 AM
what a war this would be! Hagler would win by a close decision in this one.

JACK BURTON
06-02-2007, 01:31 AM
I agree, Hagler by points.

Hydro
06-02-2007, 01:31 AM
hagler KO.

easy as that.

LaMotta had an iron chin.

LaMotta had better defense and skills than often given credit for, but probably not up to Hagler, an extremely versatile boxer-puncher.

I'd go with Hagler by decision.