View Full Version : Compromise on Emoticon BAN


ArjukanpoKarate
12-31-2002, 09:52 AM
http://www.despair.com/demotivators/acompromise.html


Have a look at that link.

zioxoiz
12-31-2002, 04:18 PM
That is ****ing lame.

VulgarTheClown
12-31-2002, 04:21 PM
never happen. they can;t readout e-mails

realkaps
12-31-2002, 04:25 PM
:-( Sue me.....

VulgarTheClown
12-31-2002, 04:27 PM
Mr. Kaps sir you wil lreceive a letter form our lawyers within the next 3 days.

ArjukanpoKarate
12-31-2002, 09:34 PM
I think it's just stupid. I mean you think you have a little privacy in your e-mail and then you read something like that. It sucks. I just really hope that they don't get away with that.

Fallout
12-31-2002, 10:48 PM
They won't, they can't sue the internet

Fallout
12-31-2002, 10:53 PM
They are selling them for free?

How ****ed up is that

lightweight
01-01-2003, 03:40 AM
Ok, how many here realize it's a big joke, and how many are taking it seriously?

Read more of the site and it's fairly obvious that it's just a big joke, like the site of a guy who wants to fight Rickson with his super martial art. :-(
________
volcano classic review (http://vaporizer.org/reviews/volcano)

lightweight
01-01-2003, 03:42 AM
"Unfortunately, in addition to having the sole legal copy of Microsoft Word, Dane also has acute dyslexia. I think it goes without saying that this has led to something of a suboptimal manufacturing process, with a defect-yield comparable to that of Plasma-display manufacturing. For every 100 Frownies(tm) that roll off the assembly line, about 30 end up being defective. Most commonly, they are missing a nose. Often, they end with a closed-parenthesis instead of an open one, resulting a "Smiley". Because of the potential for an improperly constructed Frowny(tm) to miscommunicate one's disposition, all defective ones are immediately destroyed. We would ask for your patience as we attempt to find ways to streamline this imperfect process."
________
Yamaha XVS650 (http://www.cyclechaos.com/wiki/Yamaha_XVS650)

Big_Papa
01-01-2003, 06:30 AM
that's stupid.