Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team
The Lounge  | Champions  | The Wire |  Schedule |  Audio  |  Arcade  |  The Top Ten  |  Historical  |  Email  |  Video

6 Advantages of Free Weights Over Exercise Machines


Meet Sarah.

About a year ago, Sarah saw an infomercial about a "multi-unit" workout machine. The announcer called it a "revolutionary" piece of equipment, claiming that people would see results in "just 2-4 weeks". It exercised all major body parts and the female model shown using the machine said it "was safer and more effective than free weights."

Intimidated by gyms her whole life, Sarah knew having her own home gym would be the key to her finally getting into shape. She had heard that machines were safer than free weights. Besides, the machine came with "easy to follow video instructions". The price was steep, but as Sarah imagined changing her body, she got her credit called and grabbed the phone.

On the day of delivery, Sarah was surprised to see it took up twice the space she was told it would, limiting space in her already cramped den. Excited to get started, she popped in the video, and hopped on the machine. Sarah soon found that she, at 5'3", was too small to fit on the machine for some of the exercises. She continued on anyway, trying to ignore the fact that her lower back and knees were starting to hurt a little.

Sarah used her new revolutionary machine exactly three more times. For the last six months, it has been her unofficial clothes hanger.

What happened? Sarah thought she was buying a machine that would be very easy to operate and be a safe alternative to free-weights. Unfortunately, Sarah and many others are misguided by heavily marketed hype by machine developers. When it comes to effectiveness, particularly for the beginning exerciser, free-weights (i.e., dumbbells) rate much higher than expensive machines in terms of:

1. Cost. Three or four sets of dumbbells would have cost Sarah less than 10 times the amount she spent on her machine. As she gets stronger, she would have to buy more, though even a full set would not set her back nearly as much as the machine did.

2. Space. Dumbbells take up far less space than most of the exercise equipment sold on infomercials. You can easily place them in a closet, out of sight under the bed, or in a corner. There are even dumbbells you can adjust (i.e., PowerBlock) that allow you to adjust the poundage on one set, eliminating the need for single-poundage dumbbells.

3. Variety. Most machines are designed as one-dimensional. Even the most extensive multi-unit machines will allow exercisers to perform only a limited number of movements in a restricted range of motion. Free-weights can be used in ranges of motion based on the exerciser, not a machine. Use free weights along with benches or Swiss Balls and you have multitude of exercise options.

4. Suitability. Sarah couldn't use her "multi-usage" machine for certain exercises because the machine was too big. This is not an uncommon problem. Even though most machines have adjustable seats, arm pads, and lever arms, there are limitations to their range and some may not fit the very small or very large person. However, if you can grab a dumbbell, you can use it.

5. Functionality. Exercising with free-weights increases the likelihood that the effects of the exercise will cross over into real-world situations. Think about it. How often during the day do you lie in a diagonal supine position and push weight up like you would on a machine leg press? Probably never. But how often are you required to do activities that are biomechanically identical to the squat? Sitting, getting in and out of a car, crouching down to pick something up?all the time! Properly using free weights will increase the functionality of an exercise to real-world situations.

6. Safety. It seems counterintuitive to consider free-weights as safer than machines. Most of us have heard (somewhere..) that we could get hurt with dumbbells and that machines were "safer." Maybe just the idea of someone doing a huge bench press lends itself to imagining the likelihood that one might lose control of the same amount of weight if they ever attempted it.

Safety during exercise is more about proper form, technique, concentration and control rather than exercise apparatus. Someone can get hurt on a machine just as easily as with a dumbbell if incorrect form is used. As always, if you don't know how to do something, find someone (i.e., a reputable trainer) to show you how.

Safety as a result of exercise is a long-term issue. It is not necessary for the body to stabilize itself or the weight during movements on most machines, because the weight apparatus is fixed. Key stabilizer muscles are then never given the chance to get stronger. Free-weights allow the exerciser to utilize core muscles and allow multi-plane movement that forces the exerciser to strengthen stabilizer musculature, which support joints. Over the long-term, free weights are superior to machines for building a stronger, more functional body.

You don't need to spend a fortune on a piece of exercise equipment that you'll never end up using and won't suit your needs. A few sets of dumbbells are effective, intelligent alternatives to buying equipment, especially for those setting up their own in-home gym or workout area.

About The Author

Jon Gestl, CSCS, is a personal fitness trainer and instructor in Chicago specializing in in-home and in-office fitness training. He is a United States National Aerobic Champion silver and bronze medalist and world-ranked sportaerobic competitor. He can be contacted through his website at http://www.jongestl.com.

jongestl@jongestl.com


MORE RESOURCES:

Acne Gel Linked to Rare Side Effect, Doctors Warn
WebMD
"It's a very effective first- or second-line treatment for acne," said Dr. Darrell Rigel, a clinical professor of dermatology with New York University Medical Center in New York City. "The medicine has actually been around since before World War II. It ...

and more »


Times of India

Acne : ask the expert
Times of India
Dear Pooja, I am in school and have developed a lot of acne -pimples of all sizes. They are in my face and forehead and nose. Of late, I noticed very visible blackheads too... I am too young for facials etc says my mother. What should I do? It is tough ...



MauiDerm 2015: Pre-adolescent acne may be red flag
ModernMedicine
Dermatologists should keep an eye out for acne in pre-adolescent children as young as one year because pimples may be a sign of serious medical problems, a leading dermatologist told a crowd at the Maui Derm 2015 conference this week. “It's a red flag ...



Master Herald

Acne in Younger Children Should Be Watched Carefully, Recent Research Shows
Master Herald
It's no secret that acne is linked to various other medical conditions, and the full extent of the condition's involvement in the overall health picture is not yet completely understood. Recent research has shown that physicians – and parents ...



Style.com

Acne Studios
Style.com
Wow: banal with a twist—there's a collection summation that most designers would entirely lack the cojones to coin. But that was the essence of Jonny Johansson's languid précis of his references for the season. "It's about football [soccer], Harris ...

and more »


The Journal News | LoHud.com

Acne cures that really work: Tips from a dermatologist
The Journal News | LoHud.com
It's rare to find the adolescent who doesn't suffer from an occasional breakout. But acne, a skin condition that generally arises during puberty, can lead to scarring if it's not treated properly. These days, acne is found in increasingly younger ...



Daily Nebraskan

KLAFTER: Everyone should have acne
Daily Nebraskan
Much like making people with a cat own multiple lint rollers and forbidding bowlers from talking about fingering in places other than the bowling alley, every person should be forced to have acne at least once in their life. I'm not talking about the ...

and more »


Daily Mail

Mystery of vanishing 'miracle' acne cream: Why has PanOxyl been discontinued?
Daily Mail
I found out through social media that the maker of PanOxyl - a U.S.-based GlaxoSmithKline subsidiary called Stiefel - had halted production due to a 'global manufacturing supply issue'. It had been taken off the market, along with other Stiefel acne ...



One Green Planet

5 Things You Should Know About the Link Between Dairy and Acne
One Green Planet
Most anyone who's ever dealt with acne can relate to being desperate to find the answer to the problem. Sure, we're told to avoid chocolate, chips, ice cream and cookies, but other than that, it's just “because of our hormones” or due to stress, right ...



Wall Street Journal

The Problem With Adult Acne
Wall Street Journal
Three months after Danielle Schwarz began taking antibiotics for a severe case of acne, her doctor began to notice a disturbing pattern among her patients—this mainstay treatment for the skin condition increasingly wasn't working. “I was canceling ...
Antibiotics For Acne Just Aren't Working Like They Used ToJezebel
Pick Your Poison: Adult Acne or Fatal SuperbugNew York Magazine
No More Antibiotics For The Treatment Of Acne, Say Doctors!Yahoo Lifestyle UK (blog)

all 5 news articles »

Google News


Advertisement



Section Site Map - Submit News - Feedback - Comments - Advertise with Us

Copyright © 2006 Luminati Inc. All rights reserved.