De La Hoya Compares Lara's Loss To Trinidad's Win
By Rick Reeno
MGM Grand, Las Vegas - On Saturday night, Golden Boy Promotions President Oscar De La Hoya had a flashback of his 1999 twelve round majority decision loss to Felix Trinidad, which took place at the nearby Mandalay Bay.
During that fight, De La Hoya felt he was well ahead on the scorecards and decided to coast in the championship rounds while Trinidad chased him around the ring and tried land something big. De La Hoya was wrong; the fight was very close and Trinidad secured the victory with his last rally.
When discussing the outcome of last night's contest, which saw Saul "Canelo" Alvarez (44-1-1, 31KOs) win a twelve round split decision over WBA 'regular' junior middleweight champion Erislandy Lara (19-2-2, 12KOs), De La Hoya placed the scoring blame on Lara's fight strategy.
Lara was tabbed as the winner by one judge with a card of 115-113, while the other two scores of 117-111 and 115-113 were ruled for Canelo.
"And you guys wrote about this. I was against this fight for a reason. Lara was the most avoided fighter on the planet. Nobody wanted to fight him. Why? Because of tonight. What did he do all night? [Canelo supporters at the presser start chanting 'he ran']. I apparently ran against Felix Trinidad in the last three rounds - and I lost my fight. And that was only three rounds. It was a great fight. I respect Lara because of the athlete that he is and the struggles that he went through but tonight Canelo won," De La Hoya said.
[QUOTE=ßringer;14755811]Well you recall incorrectly. De La Hoya walked away from negotiations for a Trinidad rematch on no less than [B]7[/B] different occasions. The first few were somewhat justifiable from a business perspective, as Trinidad financial demands were somewhat laughable because,…Comment by royjonesjrKTFO on 07-14-2014
A better comparison is Oscar De La Hoya Vs. Pernell Whitaker Oscar on the attack, while Pernell is on the defensive, making him miss, but not making him pay enough. And Oscar, the aggressor edges the defensive fighter.Comment by churchmouse on 07-13-2014
A strategy that Lara could not execute properly cost him the win, and Canelo did his part to secure the win by landing enough EFFECTIVE punches along with being the aggressor, to win the fight. It's professional boxing, not the…Comment by PR ESQ. on 07-13-2014
Shiet comparison. Canelo attempted to engage but doesn't have a high boxing IQ. Tito attempted to engage but Oscar was a pussey to fight. so each won accordingly but for very different reasons!!! Fuk this revisionist BS!Comment by Luilun on 07-13-2014
The difference Oscar is you won 9 straight rounds against Tito than you lost the last 3 by running Lara probably only won 4 rounds by round 9 than lost the last 2 of 3Post a Comment - View More User Comments (33)