Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team

Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | The Wire |  Audio  |  Arcade
Cunningham Still Bothered By Controversial Adamek Loss - Boxing News
Advertisement
BoxingScene Archive
• Boxing Articles
• Boxing Interviews
• Breaking News
• Boxing Press Releases
• Boxing Results
• World Boxing News
Follow BoxingScene
 
Search BoxingScene

>>>Advanced Search<<<
• Register A Free Account
• Account Login
• Boxing Schedule
• Boxing Champions
• Boxing Downloads
• Boxing Forums
• Boxing News Wire
• Boxing Photos
• Boxing History
• Boxer Search
• Fantasy Betting
• Feedback
• Fitness and Health  
• Free Homepage
• Mixed Martial Arts
• Pound For Pound
• Upcoming Fight Archive
                                                                                                                                                            ...............

 Last update:  4/20/2013       Read more by Keith Idec         
   
Cunningham Still Bothered By Controversial Adamek Loss
Share Click Here To Email Printable version Search BoxingScene Database 

By KEITH IDEC

NEW YORK — Tomasz Adamek’s decision to decline an IBF heavyweight elimination match against Kubrat Pulev benefitted Steve Cunningham.

If the 36-year-old Cunningham can upset unbeaten Tyson Fury on Saturday in The Theater at Madison Square Garden (NBC; 4 p.m. ET), he’ll oppose Pulev for the right to become Wladimir Klitschko’s mandatory challenger in the IBF’s rankings. Adamek inadvertently assisting Cunningham is fitting when you consider Cunningham (25-5, 12 KOs) seemingly out-boxed Adamek (48-2, 29 KOs) during a Dec. 22 rematch Adamek won by split decision.

“It’s a victory, but still, I’m looking at my record, man, and seeing that ‘L’ against Adamek for Dec. 22, it’s just ridiculous,” Cunningham said. “It’s heartbreaking. Fifty years from now, guys look up Steve Cunningham, they’re going to look on my record and see two losses to Adamek. It’s ridiculous. The first loss, off of three knockdowns, and I still had a split decision [loss in December 2008]. This one, no knockdowns, I out-boxed him and it’s a split decision. I don’t know what’s up, but it is what it is. I moved on and I’m here.”

As much as he wants a victory over the popular Polish contender, Cunningham doesn’t see a third fight in their future.

“I don’t care to fight Adamek again,” Cunningham said. “If he wants the fight and the fight materializes, and you guys wanted to see it, I’d do it. But he already put out a statement, saying there won’t be a Cunningham trilogy. He already put it out, because he knows. It’s one of them things. I get better as I go on. You see the first fight, you see the second fight — the third fight is going to be even worse. He knows that and he won’t do it.”

Cunningham conceded, however, that he understood why Adamek walked away from a fight against Bulgaria’s Pulev (17-0, 9 KOs), who’s ranked No. 1 by the IBF.

“I knew the money situation was miniscule,” Cunningham said, “so I couldn’t blame him for not taking that fight.”

Keith Idec covers boxing for The Record and Herald News, of Woodland Park, N.J., and BoxingScene.com. He can be reached on Twitter @Idecboxing.

Tags: Tomasz Adamek , Steve Cunningham , Tyson Fury , Fury-Cunningham , Fury vs. Cunningham


 

 User Comments and Feedback (must register to comment)

comment by ramblingalp, on 04-20-2013
[QUOTE=feroth]hahaha that was kind of an oddball comment but I like it. We should just put a ****ing asterisk next to every controversial decision on boxrec so people know to look into it at least[/QUOTE] Please don't. That would require more asterisks than there are stars in the Andromeda gal...

comment by MeanestNiceGuy, on 04-20-2013
So this is the new thing for fighters nowadays, huh? They're either looking past their current opponent, or they're too busy reminiscing about a loss, that they forget about the current opponent. Good luck Steve, you've got Fury to worry about today. I remember Chisora teeing off on Fury, but...

comment by feroth, on 04-20-2013
[QUOTE=dogfish]maybe, in the future, a machine will redo the scoring for all the old matches and every controversial result will be marked.[/QUOTE] hahaha that was kind of an oddball comment but I like it. We should just put a ****ing asterisk next to every controversial decision on boxrec so ...

comment by dogfish, on 04-20-2013
maybe, in the future, a machine will redo the scoring for all the old matches and every controversial result will be marked.

Post A Comment/View More User Comments (4) 

   
 Top Headlines
 Advertisement
 
 MMA Headlines
 
 Related Articles
  Klitschko-Pulev: Is There a Cha...
  Team Cotto Will Begin Opponent ...
  Glen Tapia, Mike Reed Returning...
  Antonio DeMarco Aims To Get Rio...
  Omar Figueroa Retracts Decision...
  Temporary Restraining Order Iss...
  Alfredo Angulo Feels He Will Be...
  Ricky Burns Hungry To Win a Wor...
  Bryan Vera Unsure if He Will Co...
  Sulaiman: Golovkin-Rubio Winner...

 Latest Active Forum Threads
Latest Active Threads
 Advertisement

 


Advertisement



Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright © 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC. All rights reserved.