Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team
The Lounge  | Champions  | The Wire |  Schedule |  Audio  |  Arcade  |  The Top Ten  |  Historical  |  Email  |  Video

The Difference Between Bankroll and Money Management


I am sure you would have heard comments like, 'if you don't have good money management skills then you simply won't win'; or how about 'money management is much more important than the selection strategy used'; or even 'you won't win if you don't have good money management skills'.There will always be a group of punters who is always bleating about the virtues of money management. These punters believe that this mystical term 'money management' is a saviour, which will turn their otherwise unprofitable approach magically into a highly profitable one, simply by changing the way they stake. I can tell you that there is as much chance of this happening as there is of Jess going on a date with Nicole Kidman.

Now I realise, that I might be stepping on your toes a little here, especially if you too have been brainwashed by the folks who worship these two words. As with anything else in this article, it is just an opinion and you are free of course to ignore completely what I have to say.I admit that I probably should not really feel as strongly as I do, but I tell you, I get some really horrible thoughts entering my mind whenever those two words are spoken.

Okay, what is all the fuss about? Just what is the difference between bankroll management and money management?

Money management (in my opinion) is when a punter is trying to make money from any form of gambling, purely by using some sort of staking approach. As we all know, it doesn't matter which game we choose (horse racing, craps, sports betting, roulette etc), if we bet 'blindly', make no mistake about it, we lose. That is to say, that if we bet on number 7 on a roulette wheel for long enough, eventually the casino will end up with our money. We might get lucky in the short-term however, but reality will set in over a half reasonable time period.

However, if you think you can beat one of these games by purely changing the amount that you stake per race/bet/spin/hand etc, then you are still playing a losing game. That is, you are trying to use money management to beat the game. Playing a poor game, but trying to win simply through staking.

We know that if we exercise our skills and knowledge, then we can turn the majority of gambling activities into profitable exercises. (Some games are easier to beat than others).

Bankroll management, on the other hand, is the decision how to stake your selections ONCE you have found a profitable approach. It is when you are winning, that you need to think about how to stake your money, NOT before you have shown that you can turn a profit, using a specific approach by betting level stakes, which is simply, the same amount every bet.

Essentially, that is the difference. Punters who try to beat a game solely through staking are using money management. It may be great fun, don't get me wrong, but not so good for the wallet.

Now it would be ignorant and arrogant of me not to mention the fact, that this whole idea of staking is quiet contentious. There a millions upon millions of punters who will swear (maybe even the majority of punters) that you can turn a losing approach into a profitable one through 'clever money management'. If that is the case, then please, don't let me stop you. The best thing that any punter can do is continue with whatever is successful for them. Very simply, if your staking approach works for you, then by all means, go ahead and continue.

I, on the other hand, prefer to use approaches, which actually may be proven to work, and that is where we get into bankroll management. How to make the most of a profitable approach is what bankroll management is all about, NOT how to find a winning approach through staking. If you don't have a profitable approach, then there is NO way that you can find a profitable approach through simply staking your selections differently. This is not an idea or a hunch - this is a decade old mathematically proven fact!

Whether punters want to listen and discover what is proven to work, or if they want to throw their heads in the sand, and claim that this is all 'academic wank' and that it does not work (as a number of punters have kindly told me), is of course up to them.

In saying this, the question has to be asked, that if it were possible to beat an otherwise unbeatable game simply through staking, it would have to be one of the greatest mysteries in the world as to how casinos would be able to exist. Casino games, such as, roulette have much lower house margins, than say, the horse races, sports betting or keno. (For example, 2.7% house advantage on roulette, against 15% - 25% on horse racing, or 5% - 10% on sports betting.) Therefore, if it were possible, one would think that the casinos would be the first to be cleaned out. Wouldn't you?However, I say to you, when ones livelihood depends on these types of decisions, I feel much more confident in relying on approaches, which may be mathematically proven to be successful, even if it is all 'academic rubbish', rather than to rely on hunches and hot streaks. In my experience, hunches and hot streaks do not put the food on the table.

Now in a tournament sense, much of the above does not apply. This is because an entrant is playing directly against another opponent, which makes this the exception to the above rule. This is where it may make sense to use some sort of staking approach which will vary, depending on the opponent's position. In a tournament, such as a casino roulette or blackjack tournament, simply playing your game in a steady and conservative manner will many more times than not, result in you maintaining, or possibly increasing, your bankroll to some extent. However, to win such tournaments, it is essential to use a somewhat more aggressive approach to beat the other players.

Therefore, in closing, if you are a money management fan and believe that the facts are just 'academic wank', and believe that games such as roulette can be beaten purely through staking, then you have one thing over those using the more mathematical approaches - you will always be welcome with open arms at any gambling establishment.

We have developed a betting simulation program that can be uses to predict your likely outcome over a series of bets. This program is available free from our website using the following address:

http://www.puntingace.com/bettingdownloads/bettingsimulation.htm

you can then test the profitability of your money management or staking plan without actually having to endure the pain of a losing a vast sum of money in the process.

We plan to delve into the staking approaches in reasonably great detail in the coming months. We will be supplying the approaches, which we believe are mathematically sound methods to handle your bankroll once you have found a profitable game, and no, they will not all be packed full of maths. There are some quick and easy ways to improve your bankroll management.

About the Author: Australians Matt Elliott and Jess Kirley, at http://www.puntingace.com have been investing together professionally on sports for over 3 years now. They take a very mathematical approach to their betting, and liken it more trading a commosity like stocks than actual gambling. They continue to lead the industry with innovative approaches to sports betting and their reputation among their peers is testament to that. Visit http://www.puntingace.com to discover how you too can turn your hobby of betting into a profitable endeavour.


MORE RESOURCES:

Skelos Confirms Proposal To Bring Casino Gambling To Long Island
CBS Local
ALBANY, N.Y. (CBSNewYork/AP) — New York State Senate Republican Leader Dean Skelos (R-Rockville Centre) confirmed a proposal Tuesday to bring video slot machines to Long Island as part of negotiations to expand casinos. After a closed-door ...

and more »


CBC.ca

Woodbine's bid to expand casino gambling rejected by Toronto council
Daily Racing Form
ETOBICOKE, Ontario – The Woodbine Entertainment Group's plans for expanded casino gambling suffered what would appear to be a fatal blow on Tuesday when Toronto City Council voted 24-20 against Mayor Rob Ford's proposal to put more slot ...
Council rejects proposal for Toronto casino - Inside TorontoinsideTORONTO.com

all 138 news articles »


Chicago Tribune

Turning up the heat on casino gambling
Hampton Union
Last week, the House Joint Committee of Ways and Means & Finance voted to reject SB 152, the casino bill, by a 23-22 margin. While this vote was not a decisive victory for either side, there are many aspects of this bill to consider before it comes up ...
Freshman House members may direct casino debateConcord Monitor
NH House Speaker expects close vote on NH casinoSeacoastonline.com
Editorial: Still a Bad Bet; NH House to Vote on Casino BillValley News
Foster's Daily Democrat -The Union Leader -Worcester Telegram
all 37 news articles »


Ohio wraps up first year of casino gambling; payoff still taking shape
Plain Dealer
Ohio voters authorized casino gambling in 2009, narrowly approving a constitutional amendment (read the amendment) conceived and championed by Rock Ohio Caesars, owner of the Horseshoe casinos, and Penn National Gaming, which developed the ...

and more »


Future of casino gambling in Texas faces hard odds this session
Community Impact Newspaper
Hindered by ethical and religious objections to gambling and a healthy state bank account that gives little impetus to look for additional revenue streams, Senate Joint Resolution 64, which would open Texas to Vegas-style casinos and revitalize the ...



CardPlayer.com

Ohio Adds First Two Names To Casino Gambling Black List - Card Player
CardPlayer.com
Ohio casino regulators have added the first two names to its version of a black book. According to the Plain Dealer, the “involuntary exclusion” list, as it's called, is similar to those in other states, most notably in Nevada, which has the infamous ...



NH Trade Workers Come Out to Support Casino Gambling
Patch.com
Representatives from the NH Building and Trades Council and NH Ironworkers both brought out a wave of casino supporters this afternoon to create a presence at the House Special Committee Executive session and vote on Senate Bill 152. See video above ...



UMass research team chosen to conduct $3.64 million research project on ...
MassLive.com
... research team has been chosen by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission to conduct a multi-year $3.64 million research project - believed to be the first of its kind - to study the economic and social impacts of introducing casino gambling to ...
UMASS team to measure effects of casinosBoston.com (blog)
UMass Amherst to conduct comprehensive gaming researchSouthCoastToday.com
Massachusetts launches gambling study, believed most comprehensive to datePhys.Org (press release)
Boston Business Journal -WSHM-TV
all 7 news articles »


CardPlayer.com

Delaware names vendor for online casino gambling system
The News Journal
DOVER — State lottery officials this week began negotiations with the winners of a bid to run Delaware's online casino gambling system, slated for launch by the end of September. A partnership venture between Scientific Games International and ...
Casino gambling surges most since crisis - WNDWND.com
Casino Gambling Data Shows Economic Conditions Are BetterOPB News
Illinois Governor Happier With Latest Casino Gambling Bill - Card PlayerCardPlayer.com
Wilkes Barre Times-Leader -KTEP
all 174 news articles »


Just say no to casino gambling
Monadnock Ledger Transcript
I believe that voters of New Hampshire should tell our governor and state representatives to just say 'No' to casino gambling in the state of New Hampshire. There are many reasons but here are some of them to consider: 1. As revenue generation for the ...
NH's revenue dip: No cause for alarmThe Union Leader

all 5 news articles »

Google News


Advertisement



Section Site Map - Submit News - Feedback - Comments - Advertise with Us

Copyright © 2006 Luminati Inc. All rights reserved.