Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team
The Lounge  | Champions  | The Wire |  Schedule |  Audio  |  Arcade  |  The Top Ten  |  Historical  |  Email  |  Video

The Difference Between Bankroll and Money Management


I am sure you would have heard comments like, 'if you don't have good money management skills then you simply won't win'; or how about 'money management is much more important than the selection strategy used'; or even 'you won't win if you don't have good money management skills'.There will always be a group of punters who is always bleating about the virtues of money management. These punters believe that this mystical term 'money management' is a saviour, which will turn their otherwise unprofitable approach magically into a highly profitable one, simply by changing the way they stake. I can tell you that there is as much chance of this happening as there is of Jess going on a date with Nicole Kidman.

Now I realise, that I might be stepping on your toes a little here, especially if you too have been brainwashed by the folks who worship these two words. As with anything else in this article, it is just an opinion and you are free of course to ignore completely what I have to say.I admit that I probably should not really feel as strongly as I do, but I tell you, I get some really horrible thoughts entering my mind whenever those two words are spoken.

Okay, what is all the fuss about? Just what is the difference between bankroll management and money management?

Money management (in my opinion) is when a punter is trying to make money from any form of gambling, purely by using some sort of staking approach. As we all know, it doesn't matter which game we choose (horse racing, craps, sports betting, roulette etc), if we bet 'blindly', make no mistake about it, we lose. That is to say, that if we bet on number 7 on a roulette wheel for long enough, eventually the casino will end up with our money. We might get lucky in the short-term however, but reality will set in over a half reasonable time period.

However, if you think you can beat one of these games by purely changing the amount that you stake per race/bet/spin/hand etc, then you are still playing a losing game. That is, you are trying to use money management to beat the game. Playing a poor game, but trying to win simply through staking.

We know that if we exercise our skills and knowledge, then we can turn the majority of gambling activities into profitable exercises. (Some games are easier to beat than others).

Bankroll management, on the other hand, is the decision how to stake your selections ONCE you have found a profitable approach. It is when you are winning, that you need to think about how to stake your money, NOT before you have shown that you can turn a profit, using a specific approach by betting level stakes, which is simply, the same amount every bet.

Essentially, that is the difference. Punters who try to beat a game solely through staking are using money management. It may be great fun, don't get me wrong, but not so good for the wallet.

Now it would be ignorant and arrogant of me not to mention the fact, that this whole idea of staking is quiet contentious. There a millions upon millions of punters who will swear (maybe even the majority of punters) that you can turn a losing approach into a profitable one through 'clever money management'. If that is the case, then please, don't let me stop you. The best thing that any punter can do is continue with whatever is successful for them. Very simply, if your staking approach works for you, then by all means, go ahead and continue.

I, on the other hand, prefer to use approaches, which actually may be proven to work, and that is where we get into bankroll management. How to make the most of a profitable approach is what bankroll management is all about, NOT how to find a winning approach through staking. If you don't have a profitable approach, then there is NO way that you can find a profitable approach through simply staking your selections differently. This is not an idea or a hunch - this is a decade old mathematically proven fact!

Whether punters want to listen and discover what is proven to work, or if they want to throw their heads in the sand, and claim that this is all 'academic wank' and that it does not work (as a number of punters have kindly told me), is of course up to them.

In saying this, the question has to be asked, that if it were possible to beat an otherwise unbeatable game simply through staking, it would have to be one of the greatest mysteries in the world as to how casinos would be able to exist. Casino games, such as, roulette have much lower house margins, than say, the horse races, sports betting or keno. (For example, 2.7% house advantage on roulette, against 15% - 25% on horse racing, or 5% - 10% on sports betting.) Therefore, if it were possible, one would think that the casinos would be the first to be cleaned out. Wouldn't you?However, I say to you, when ones livelihood depends on these types of decisions, I feel much more confident in relying on approaches, which may be mathematically proven to be successful, even if it is all 'academic rubbish', rather than to rely on hunches and hot streaks. In my experience, hunches and hot streaks do not put the food on the table.

Now in a tournament sense, much of the above does not apply. This is because an entrant is playing directly against another opponent, which makes this the exception to the above rule. This is where it may make sense to use some sort of staking approach which will vary, depending on the opponent's position. In a tournament, such as a casino roulette or blackjack tournament, simply playing your game in a steady and conservative manner will many more times than not, result in you maintaining, or possibly increasing, your bankroll to some extent. However, to win such tournaments, it is essential to use a somewhat more aggressive approach to beat the other players.

Therefore, in closing, if you are a money management fan and believe that the facts are just 'academic wank', and believe that games such as roulette can be beaten purely through staking, then you have one thing over those using the more mathematical approaches - you will always be welcome with open arms at any gambling establishment.

We have developed a betting simulation program that can be uses to predict your likely outcome over a series of bets. This program is available free from our website using the following address:

http://www.puntingace.com/bettingdownloads/bettingsimulation.htm

you can then test the profitability of your money management or staking plan without actually having to endure the pain of a losing a vast sum of money in the process.

We plan to delve into the staking approaches in reasonably great detail in the coming months. We will be supplying the approaches, which we believe are mathematically sound methods to handle your bankroll once you have found a profitable game, and no, they will not all be packed full of maths. There are some quick and easy ways to improve your bankroll management.

About the Author: Australians Matt Elliott and Jess Kirley, at http://www.puntingace.com have been investing together professionally on sports for over 3 years now. They take a very mathematical approach to their betting, and liken it more trading a commosity like stocks than actual gambling. They continue to lead the industry with innovative approaches to sports betting and their reputation among their peers is testament to that. Visit http://www.puntingace.com to discover how you too can turn your hobby of betting into a profitable endeavour.


MORE RESOURCES:

Casino gambling in Florida
Sun-Sentinel
A whiff of sulfur persists around casino gambling in the corridors of power. The only way our lawmakers will consider allowing it into the state (with its associated tax bounty) is to locate it in the two South Florida counties that are already so ...



What's it take to apply for a NY casino gambling license: money and an ...
Albany Business Review
The state is imposing a tough, thorough and, officials say, transparent vetting process for awarding up to four licenses upstate, including at least one in the Albany/Saratoga region. The rules are understandable considering the lucrative nature of the ...



SFGate

Indian casino gambling revenue growth is slowing, report says
Los Angeles Times
The economy may have dug itself out of the worst recession in a generation, but gamblers apparently are still reluctant to put their money at risk in U.S. Indian casinos. Gambling revenue at tribal casinos slowed in 2012, growing at a slower pace than ...
Alabama Indian casino gambling growth slowsTimes Daily
Report: Oklahoma tribal gambling revenue risesNative Times

all 307 news articles »


New Hampshire Business Review

Lure of casino gambling remains fool's gold
New Hampshire Business Review
Far from addressing our long-term fiscal challenges, the adverse financial, social and regulatory consequences of casino gambling would merely exacerbate them. Anybody with even a basic knowledge of finance or the casino industry knows that gambling is ...

and more »


Casino Gambling Bill Gets House Hearing Today
Patch.com
Casino Gambling Bill Gets House Hearing Today. The bill would legalize up to 5,000 slots and 240 table games at two casino locations. Posted by Dan Tuohy , April 10, 2014 at 05:45 AM. Comment3 2. More. Repost; Print this page · Email; Flag as ...
NH casino supporters tout revenue sharing among all communitiesConcord Monitor
Revenue sharing offered in attempt to bring expanded gambling to NHNewHampshire.com
Senate bill to legalize 2 casinos goes before New Hampshire House committeeGreenfield Daily Reporter

all 20 news articles »


SFGate

Capital Beat: Reading the tea leaves on casino gambling (and more)
Concord Monitor
When a bill legalizing a single casino lost by 29 votes in the New Hampshire House two weeks ago, Steve Duprey, a leading anti-casino voice, called the vote a “silver stake” in the heart of casino proposals – a final defeat in a 16-year battle to bring ...
What dooms casinos: It's not the fine printThe Union Leader

all 378 news articles »


Philly.com

More states find bets on casino gambling aren't paying off as hoped
Crain's Cleveland Business (blog)
Thirty-nine states have casino gambling of some kind, up from only two in 1988, and more Las Vegas-style resorts are on the way in New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and Maryland, the news service reports. “They have saturation problems,” says ...
Revenue growth slowing at Indian casinosFall River Herald News
Local Casinos Are a Losing BetBusinessweek

all 50 news articles »


Newsmakers 3/21/2014: Ernie Almonte, casino gambling in Mass.
Providence Eyewitness News
On the second half of Newsmakers Providence College professor Dr. Patrick Kelly and UMass Dartmouth professor Dr. Clyde Barrow join Tim White and Ted Nesi to discuss the impact of casino gambling in Massachusetts on Rhode Island. From the fiscal to ...

and more »


Students to benefit from casino gambling
WKBN/WYFX-TV
YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio (WKBN) – Casino gambling is about to pay off for some area college students. About 2,500 students statewide will get paid internships and co-ops through a program funded by casino license fees. The Ohio Board of Regents reported ...

and more »


Could legislation allow casino gambling in neighboring town?
Sentry
Scarborough Downs officials are searching for new ways to potentially bring casino gambling to the harness racing facility now that a piece of legislation that could have allowed it has been nixed at the state house. Last week, the state Senate voted ...

and more »

Google News


Advertisement



Section Site Map - Submit News - Feedback - Comments - Advertise with Us

Copyright 2006 Luminati Inc. All rights reserved.