Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team

Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | The Wire |  Audio  |  Arcade
Carl Froch: Groves Rejected Trilogy Clause in Contract - Boxing News
Advertisement
BoxingScene Archive
• Boxing Articles
• Boxing Interviews
• Breaking News
• Boxing Press Releases
• Boxing Results
• World Boxing News
Follow BoxingScene
 
Search BoxingScene

>>>Advanced Search<<<
• Register A Free Account
• Account Login
• Boxing Schedule
• Boxing Champions
• Boxing Downloads
• Boxing Forums
• Boxing News Wire
• Boxing Photos
• Boxing History
• Boxer Search
• Fantasy Betting
• Feedback
• Fitness and Health  
• Free Homepage
• Mixed Martial Arts
• Pound For Pound
• Upcoming Fight Archive
                                                                                                                                                            ...............

 Last update:  5/29/2014       Read more by Edward Chaykovsky         
   
Carl Froch: Groves Rejected Trilogy Clause in Contract
Share Click Here To Email Printable version Search BoxingScene Database 

By Edward Chaykovsky

IBF/WBA 'regular' super middleweight champion Carl Froch does not expect a trilogy fight with domestic rival George Groves. This coming Saturday night at Wembley Stadium in London, 80,000 fans will pack the house to watch the two boxers get it one for a second time. Last November, Froch defeated Groves with a controversial ninth round stoppage.

Froch claims that Groves rejected a contract clause which called for a rematch clause. Groves recently signed with Germany-based Sauerland Event.

"George has got his second go at me but doesn’t fancy a third if he happens to get lucky. Maybe he’s not as confident as he’s pretending," Froch told Daily Mail.

Tags: Carl Froch , George Groves , Froch-Groves , Froch vs. Groves


 

 User Comments and Feedback (must register to comment)

comment by PittyPat, on 05-29-2014
Hopefully no Froch-Kessler III in 2015. Wouldn't surprise me at all though, especially if Froch loses. A "farewell match" in Nottingham against his old nemesis sounds predictable.

comment by stefjonno1, on 05-29-2014
[QUOTE=hamada44]This prick. Carl froch didnt want this rematch. Its on record he said he doesn't want to go over old ground. He wanted jcc jr in vegas.[/QUOTE] Correct. He say's a lot of thing's then seems to forget what he said lol.

comment by Weebler I, on 05-29-2014
[QUOTE=MDPopescu]Regardless the outcome of the rematch, the trilogy clause is only favoring Froch. The Ugly Kid took the right decision.[/QUOTE] and if it's a draw? [QUOTE=MDPopescu]It was Hearn who wanted rematches -- they're big money in this case.[/QUOTE] Hearn claimed he never asked for a ...

comment by MDPopescu, on 05-29-2014
It was Hearn who wanted rematches -- they're big money in this case.

comment by hamada44, on 05-29-2014
This prick. Carl froch didnt want this rematch. Its on record he said he doesn't want to go over old ground. He wanted jcc jr in vegas. The ibf his gredy promoter and his pay masters sky forced him into this. They knew this would generate 8 figures.

Post A Comment/View More User Comments (18) 

   
 Top Headlines
 Advertisement
 
 MMA Headlines
 
 Related Articles
  FFM Box Promotion's Event Takes...
  Adam Booth: Perez Ready For Any...
  Spadafora: No Surprise if Salka...
  Algieri's Promoter: Jab is Key ...
  Saunders Talks Blandamura, Trai...
  Adrian Gonzalez Aiming for Dome...
  Brook: Winning IBF Title - Khan...
  Arum Sees World Title, Viloria ...
  Jhonny Gonzalez-Cristian Mijare...
  Tomasz Adamek-Artur Szpilka Loo...

 Latest Active Forum Threads
Latest Active Threads
 Advertisement

 


Advertisement



Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright © 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC. All rights reserved.