Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team

Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | The Wire |  Audio  |  Arcade
Campbell Camp Begins Appeal Process With CSAC - Boxing News
BoxingScene Archive
• Boxing Articles
• Boxing Interviews
• Breaking News
• Boxing Press Releases
• Boxing Results
• World Boxing News
Search BoxingScene

>>>Advanced Search<<<
• Register A Free Account
• Account Login
• Boxing Schedule
• Boxing Champions
• Boxing Downloads
• Boxing Forums
• Boxing News Wire
• Boxing Photos
• Boxing History
• Boxer Search
• Boxing Tickets
• Fantasy Betting
• Feedback
• Fitness and Health  
• Free Homepage
• Mixed Martial Arts
• MMA Tickets
• Pound For Pound
• Ring Card Girls
• Upcoming Fight Archive

 Last update:  08-02-2009      Read more by Rick Reeno            
   
Campbell Camp Begins Appeal Process With CSAC
Share Click Here To Email Printable version Search BoxingScene Database 

By Rick Reeno

BoxingScene.com was advised that Nate Campbell's camp has already begun the appeal process with the California State Athletic Commission. On Saturday night at the Agua Caliente Casino in Rancho Mirage, California, Timothy Bradley retained his WBO junior welterweight title with a third-round TKO after Nate Campbell's vision was hindered in his left eye. The fight was stopped in Campbell's corner before the start of the fourth.

There was no disputing the clash of heads but there is plenty of incorrect information regarding the events that led to the fight being stopped. From I was told by Terry Trekas, Campbell's co-promoter, the fight was not stopped because of the cut. The fight was stopped when the ringside physician made a determination that Campbell had blood behind the eye.

Prior to the stoppage, Campbell had told his corner that he was seeing spots in the left eye and advised them to stop the fight because something was wrong. When the doctor entered the ring to take a look, he spotted blood behind Campbell's eye and told his corner the fight was immediately being stopped.

Campbell was later taken to the hospital to check for possible retina damage. The necessary paperwork has already been presented to the California commission to begin the appeal process and Campbell's camp will present their case to the WBO. They hope the official fight verdict will be changed from a TKO loss to a no-decision. Campbell's camp does not have any issues with Bradley or his promoter Gary Shaw. They blame the referee David Mendoza for making an incorrect call by ruling that Campbell's eye damage was caused by a punch.

“It has nothing to do with the cut. The doctor saw blood behind Nate’s eye and immediately stopped it. The doctor told him to go immediately to the hospital because there could be possible retina damage. The commission members tried to drag Nate out of the ring so he could go to the hospital but Nate wanted to stay to give his side of the story.  Nate is at the hospital and my main concern is that he doesn’t have any retina damage,” Trekas said to BoxingScene.

"The clash of heads caused the damage to the eye and everyone, even the referee, said there was a clash of heads. The fight should have been a no-decision."

 

 User Comments and Feedback (must register to comment)

on 08-04-2009 by Silencers
[QUOTE=BennyST;5827363]The whole point was that it was such an obvious headbutt and Campbell insisted that the ref called a headbutt ruling after it happened. Whatever happened, the ref was simply [I]terrible[/I] and had no clue as to what was going on in there at all. No time out was taken even ...

on 08-04-2009 by BennyST
[QUOTE=voneric;5821407]got someone to reply lol. i looked at the fight over again and would i agree that the fight should of been a no contest but i am still glad it wasnt. Nate was straight up lying, and [B]as a liar myself[/B], we can spot eachother. He was searching his mind for the right word...

on 08-04-2009 by baracuda
fukk that quitter...i hope his appeal gets trashed....

on 08-04-2009 by BennyST
[QUOTE=Silencers;5813702]If it's an injury and the fight was stopped wouldn't it be a TKO anyways? I thought the ND rule was only in an event where the fight was stopped due to a cut caused by a headbutt, if Campbell suffered some type of retina injury then should that be changed to a ND?[/QUOTE]...

on 08-03-2009 by voneric
got someone to reply lol. i looked at the fight over again and would i agree that the fight should of been a no contest but i am still glad it wasnt. Nate was straight up lying, and as a liar myself, we can spot eachother. He was searching his mind for the right words and thats why it came out ak...

Post A Comment/View More User Comments 

   
 Top Headlines
 MMA Headlines
 
 Related Articles
  Shumenov-Campillo: Three Panels...
  Pacquiao-Mosley, Mayweather Rev...
  Soto-Diaz Could Replace Margari...
  Timothy Bradley-Edwin Valero, A...
  James Kirkland: Tentative Retur...
  Floyd Mayweather Signs Contract...
  Donaire's Hit List: Darchinyan,...
  Katsidis vs Guerrero, Maidana v...
  Floyd Mayweather Jr. Talks Mann...
  Shumenov's Decision: Protest Co...
 Latest Active Forum Threads
Latest Active Threads
 What's New at BoxingScene.com

 


Advertisement




Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright © 2003-2009 BoxingScene LLC. All rights reserved.